Frequently, when growing III–V semiconductors on germanium substrates, unexpected
differences between nominally identical substrates are encountered. Using
atomic force microscopy (AFM), we have
analysed a set of germanium substrates sharing the same specifications. The
substrates come from the same vendor but different results come about in terms
of the morphology of the epilayers produced by the same epitaxial routine (i.e. substrate W1 produced
epilayers with good morphology while substrate WX produced epilayers with defects). The morphological
analysis has been carried out on (a) epiready substrates; (b) samples after a
high-temperature bake at 700 °C; and (c) on the samples after a hydride (PH3) annealing at 640 °C. In the two first stages all
substrates
(both W1 and WX) show the
same good morphology with RMS roughness below 3 Å in all cases. It is in the third stage (annealing in PH3) that
the morphology degrades and the differences between the samples become
apparent. After phosphine exposure at 640 °C, the RMS roughness of both
substrates approximately doubles, and their surface appears as full of peaks
and valleys on the nanometre scale. Despite the general appearance of the
samples being similar, a careful analysis of their surface reveals that the
substrates that produce bad morphologies (WX) show higher peaks, and some of
their roughness parameters, namely, surface kurtosis and the surface skewness,
are considerably degraded.
Source:Journal of Crystal
Growth
If you need more information
about Analysis of germanium epiready wafers for III–V heteroepitaxy, please
visit our website:http://www.germaniumwafers.com, send us email at
powerwaymaterial@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment