In this paper, we perform liquid-assisted picosecond laser
cutting of 150 μm thin germanium wafers from the rear side. By investigating the
cutting efficiency (the ability to allow an one-line cut-through) and quality
(characterized by groove morphologies on both sides), the pros and cons of this
technique under different conditions are clarified. Specifically, with laser
fluence fixed, repetition rate and scanning speed are varied to show quality and
efficiency control by means of laser parameter modulation. It is found that low
repetition rate ablation in liquid gives rise to a better cut quality on the
front side than high repetition rate ablation since it avoids dispersed
nanoparticles redeposition resulting from a bubble collapse, unlike the case of
100 kHz which leads to large nanorings near the grooves resulting from a strong
interaction of bubbles and the case of 50 kHz which leads to random cutting due
to the interaction of the former pulse induced cavitation bubble and the
subsequent laser pulse. Furthermore, ethanol is mixed with pure distilled water
to assess the liquid's impact on the cutting efficiency and cutting quality. The
results show that increasing the ethanol fraction decreases the ablation
efficiency but simultaneously, greatly improves the cutting quality. The
improvement of cut quality as ethanol ratio increases may be attributed to less
laser beam interference by a lower density of bubbles which adhere near the cut
kerf during ablation. A higher density of bubbles generated from ethanol
vaporization during laser ablation in liquid will cause stronger bubble
shielding effect toward the laser beam propagation and therefore result in less
laser energy available for the cut, which is the main reason for the decrease of
cut efficiency in water–ethanol mixtures. Our findings give an insight into
under which condition the rear-side laser cutting of thin solar cells should be
performed: high repetition, pure distilled water and high laser power are
favorable for high-speed rough cutting but the cut kerf suffers from strong side
effects of ripples, nanoredeposition occurrence, while low laser power at low
repetition rate (10 kHz), mixed solution (1 wt% ethanol in water) and moderate
scanning speed (100 μm/s) are preferable for ultrafine high-quality debris-free
cutting. The feasibility of high-quality cut is a good indication of using rear
laser ablation in liquid to cut thinner wafers. More importantly, this technique
spares any post cleaning steps to reduce the risk to the contamination or crack
of the thin wafers.